The ‘con’ in econometrics made visible

http://cafehayek.com/2011/04/the-con-in-econometrics-made-visible.html


Econometrics

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2011/02/how-best-to-learn-some-econometrics.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+marginalrevolution%2FhCQh+%28Marginal+Revolution%29


Stephen Levitt on Economic Methodology

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/06/better-late-than-never-the-explanation-for-a-puzzling-pattern-in-gas-prices/

“…it points out the dangers of a discipline like economics in which there are “many degrees of freedom,” i.e. where there are lots of different possible explanations floating around. Usually that means that an economist can come up with some rationale to explain just about any outcome imaginable. Often it won’t be the right explanation, but absent some way to disprove it, many people can be convinced it is the truth.”


Ed Leamer knocks it out of the park (again)

http://mungowitzend.blogspot.com/2010/07/ed-leamer-knocks-it-out-of-park-again.html


Leamer – Let’s Take the Con out of Econometrics

http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v73y1983i1p31-43.html


Correlation is not Causation

http://knowledgeproblem.com/2009/11/13/you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-or-why-oil-production-declines-with-rock-and-roll/


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.