The Political Economy of the Creeping Militarization of U.S. Foreign Policy

http://www.bepress.com/peps/vol17/iss1/4/


U.S. Military Support and Terrorist Attacks on Americans

http://www.themonkeycage.org/2011/02/us_military_support_and_terror.html


Delusions of Grandeur: On the Creeping Militarization of U.S. Foreign Policy

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1736765


Should We End Military Recruiting in High Schools as a Matter of Child Protection and Public Health?

http://ajph.aphapublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/101/1/19?etoc


Military Spending/Gross Domestic Product = Nonsense for Budget Policymaking: The Independent Review: The Independent Institute

http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?a=701

Daniel J. Smith
Sent Via Mobile Phone
http://www.danieljosephsmith.com


Political Limits to Globalization — by Daron Acemoglu, Pierre Yared

Sent to you via Google Reader

Political Limits to Globalization — by Daron Acemoglu, Pierre Yared

Despite the major advances in information technology that have shaped the recent wave of globalization, openness to trade is still a political choice, and trade policy can change with shifts in domestic political equilibria. This paper suggests that a particular threat and a limiting factor to globalization and its future developments may be militarist sentiments that appear to be on the rise among many nations around the globe today. We proxy militarism by spending on the military and the size of the military, and document that over the past 20 years, countries experiencing greater increases in militarism according to these measures have had lower growth in trade. Focusing on bilateral trade flows, we also show that controlling flexibly for country trends, a pair of countries jointly experiencing greater increases in militarism has lower growth in bilateral trade.

Daniel J. SmithSent Via Mobile Phone


Was the Iraq War Worth It?

http://jeffreymiron.blogspot.com/2009/11/was-iraq-war-worth-it.html


Your aid dollars at work… suppressing voters

Sent to you via Google Reader

Your aid dollars at work… suppressing voters

Colombia receives more U.S. military aid than all but Israel and Egypt. That aid is allocated in an unusual way: to specific brigades and bases of the Colombian armed forces. I wish I’d noticed that. Instead, I learn the fact in a new paper by Suresh Naidu and Oedrilla Dube.

With town-by-town variation in military aid, Dube and Naidu can look how annual changes affect local violence and politics. The result?

a 1% increase in US military assistance increases paramilitary attacks by 1.5% more in base municipalities, and lowers turnout for mayoral elections by .2% and .12% more in militarily and electorally contested regions

Their intuition: military aid indirectly helps paramilitary groups carry out political attacks and intimidate voters.

On the plus side, this at least suggests our aid is effective at something.

I wouldn’t say such evidence damns Plan Colombia. Fighting drug-funded insurgents is ugly but important. You don’t always get to pick your allies. But it suggests the U.S. might have a greater obligation to promote local democracy and safety alongside its military aid (and no, not by the military themselves).

Suresh is on the economics and political science job markets, and is easily one of the smartest and most creative scholars I know. Interview this man.

Daniel J. SmithSent Via Mobile Phone


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.