Solitary Confinement

http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2012/07/solitary-confinement.html


Rape Factories Why is the government doing so little to end sexual assault in prisons?

http://reason.com/archives/2011/06/20/rape-factories


The Bottom One Percent

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/04/the_bottom_one.html


Criminal Injustice

http://healthblog.ncpa.org/criminal-injustice/

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/books/review/book-review-convicting-the-innocent-where-criminal-prosecutions-go-wrong-by-brandon-l-garrett.html


The Lighter the Skin, the Shorter the Prison Term?

http://www.theroot.com/views/lighter-skin-shorter-prison-term


Rape Factories – Reason Magazine

http://reason.com/archives/2011/06/20/rape-factories

 


In Favor Of Flogging

http://www.overcomingbias.com/2011/06/in-favor-of-flogging.html


Prison Rape: Still a Problem. Government: Still Not All That Concerned About It.

Sent to you via Google Reader

Prison Rape: Still a Problem. Government: Still Not All That Concerned About It.

 


World’s Largest Jailer By Far, It’s Not Even Close

http://mjperry.blogspot.com/2011/03/worlds-largest-jailer-by-far-its-not.html


Immigrant Lawlessness

http://www.amconmag.com/article/2010/mar/01/00022//

HT: David Skarbek


US has highest population prison rate in the world

http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/law/research/icps/downloads/wppl-8th_41.pdf

http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1764


Criminal Recidivism after Prison and Electronic Monitoring — by Rafael Di Tella, Ernesto Schargrodsky

Sent to you via Google Reader

Criminal Recidivism after Prison and Electronic Monitoring — by Rafael Di Tella, Ernesto Schargrodsky

We study the re-arrest rates for two groups: individuals formerly in prison and individuals formerly under electronic monitoring (EM). We find that the recidivism rate of former prisoners is 22% while that for those a€treated’ with electronic monitoring is 13% (40% lower). We convince ourselves that the estimates are causal using peculiarities of the Argentine setting. For example, we have almost as much information as the judges have when deciding on the allocation of EM; the program is rationed to only some offenders; and some institutional features (such as bad prison conditions) convert ideological differences across judges (to which detainees are randomly matched) into very large differences in the allocation of electronic monitoring.

Daniel J. SmithSent Via Mobile Phone


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.