Newest Fox News piece: President Obama’s strange definition of fairness

My newest piece at Fox News starts this way:

During his State of the Union address Tuesday night, President Obama pushed for higher tax rates on what he called “the wealthiest Americans.”

He declared: “Tax reform should follow the Buffett rule: If you make more than $1 million a year, you should not pay less than 30 percent in taxes.” As usual, the president motivated the higher taxes with references to “fair play” and getting the wealthy to pay their “fair share” of taxes.

“Fairness” was the codeword of the State of the Union address, not the chronic problem of lingering high unemployment, something the president never even mentioned.

Of course, Obama emphasized “fairness,” but his newest attacks on the wealthy not paying their “fair share” very conveniently comes right after Mitt Romney revealed that he has averaged paying a 14 percent tax rate over the last two years.

Unfortunately, some Republicans come across as confused about capital gains taxes. Romney pushes a weak defense . . . .

Daniel J. SmithSent via mobile phone
Assistant Professor of Economics
Manuel H. Johnson Center for Political Economy
137 Bibb Graves Hall
Troy University
Phone: 334-808-6485
Email: smith.dan.j
Website: http://www.danieljosephsmith.com

Böhm-Bawerk for the Citizen

Economics is often considered the dismal science. To the average person it appears dry and boring but this should not be the case. While economics is not as dismal as it is often portrayed, it is not something the average person must learn. As Murray Rothbard once said,

It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a “dismal science.” But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.

In the current world, however, there are fewer excuses for not familiarizing ourselves with economics. This is because, as Peter Boettke often says, while economics is a deadly serious subject, it can explain in simple terms the world around us. Issues such as inflation, the financial crisis, unemployment, unionism, protectionism, taxation, the war on terror, the war on drugs, and more are all tied in with economics and our everyday lives. And as Ludwig von Mises said,

A man who talks about these problems without having acquainted himself with the fundamental ideas of economic theory is simply a babbler who parrot-like repeats what he has picked up incidentally from other fellows who are not better informed than he himself.

In today’s document Mises explains Capital and Interest should be read not only be professional economists, but also by the average person. Capital and Interest is a technical work, but as Mises put it,

Although Böhm-Bawerk’s great opus is “mere theory” and abstains from any practical application, it is the most powerful intellectual weapon in the great struggle of the Western way of life against the destruction of Soviet barbarism.

While our current threats may no longer include Soviet barbarism, technical works in economics are important for any concerned citizen hoping to sound off on our current issues in an informed and intelligent manner. While Capital and Interest may not be the most exciting book on economics it is important and insightful.

Download Mises Review of Böhm-Bawerk’s Capital and Interest here.

Daniel J. SmithSent via mobile phone
Assistant Professor of Economics
Manuel H. Johnson Center for Political Economy
137 Bibb Graves Hall
Troy University
Phone: 334-808-6485
Email: smith.dan.j
Website: http://www.danieljosephsmith.com

Daniel J. Smith
Sent via mobile phone
Assistant Professor of Economics
Manuel H. Johnson Center for Political Economy
137 Bibb Graves Hall
Troy University
Phone: 334-808-6485
Email: smith.dan.j@gmail.com
Website: http://www.danieljosephsmith.com

PETA Should Praise Capitalism